Research and Whitepapers
4 min read
6 min read

Overcoming Hallucinations and Biases in LLM: A Step Towards Reliable Medical Applications

By modifying the role of LLMs and turning them into evaluators capable of self-correction, we can significantly improve their reliability and make them a more dependable resource in the medical domain.

Listen on SpotifyListen on Apple Podcasts

Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, offer tremendous potential in various fields, including medicine. However, biases and hallucinations that emerge from these models can have severe consequences in the medical domain.

To mitigate the potential negative effects of biases and hallucinations, research proposes a novel role for LLMs through Evaluator and Fixer models, which are tasked with assessing their own generated outputs for errors and inaccuracies.

A case example demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through a side-by-side comparison of notes generated with and without the Evaluator and Fixer models in play.

This study contributes to addressing the challenges of biases and hallucinations in LLMs, particularly within the medical domain. Further research and development in this area can pave the way for advanced language models that significantly impact the healthcare industry and support clinicians in delivering optimal care without exposure to undue risk.

Access the full report here!

text

Realize the full potential of Healthcare AI with DeepScribe

Explore how DeepScribe’s customizable ambient AI platform can help you save time, improve patient care, and maximize revenue.

Get in touch
AI Medical ScribeKLAS scoreSpecialty supportDocumentation intelligence (context, coding, automation)EHR SupportCustomizationRollout model and enterprise readinessBest for
DeepScribe98.8 / 100*Deep specialty coverage: oncology, cardiology, urology, orthopedics, gastroenterology, + moreContextual notes (pulls history, labs,, etc.)  CPT, ICD-10, HCC codingEpic, athenahealth, DrChrono, eClinicalWorks, iKnowMed, OncoEMR, UroChart, ModMed, Objective Medical Systems, + moreDeep, per-clinician customization; learns each clinician’s style and supports granular control over templates, structure, and phrasing.Structured enterprise rollouts with governance, analytics, and at-the-elbow supportHealth systems, private practices, and specialists that need customizable, specialty-aware AI for complex workflows
Abridge95.3 / 100Strong in primary care and templated, compliance-driven workflowsContextual notes (pulls history, labs,, etc.)  CPT, ICD-10, HCC codingEpic (primarily), athenahealth, CernerConfigurable templates and note sections; orgs define templates, clinicians adjust sections within structured, guideline-aligned notesEnterprise deployments optimized for Epic workflowsHealth systems on Epic, particularly within primary care
Commure93.3 / 100*General coverage; specialty outcomes still emergingCPT, ICD-10 codingBroad EHR supportCustom templatesOn-site enablement and configurationHealth systems that want hands-on rollout support and iterative specialty build-out
Suki93.2 / 100Fast time-to-value in primary care; specialty depth variesAmbient notes, dictation  ICD-10, HCC codingEpic, athena, Oracle health, MeditechMulti-mode control (ambient, dictation, commands)Fast time-to-value; standard enterprise onboardingPrimary care and multi-specialty groups seeking fast time-to-value
Microsoft DAX92 / 100Multi-specialty support; strongest in Epic workflowsICD-10 codingEpic (primarily), CentricityCustom templatesStructured enterprise rollouts; heavy IT involvementOrganizations on Epic
Nabla90.9 / 100Flexible; broad but maturing specialty depthAmbient notes, agentic automation  ICD-10, HCC codingEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen Custom templatesLightweight, flexible deployment via web and mobileOrganizations that want flexible, lightweight solution
EpicN/ABuilt for Epic-native workflows; specialty depth unknownStill emergingNative to EpicStill emergingStill emergingOrganizations on Epic